An analysis of the openness of historical archives:based on the 'Rekidai Hōan'

Wenwen Zhao

doi:10.71113/JMSS.v2i2.237

Authors

Wenwen Zhao Nanyang Technological University, Singapora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71113/JMSS.v2i2.237

Keywords:

Openness of Archives, Digital Archiving, Rekidai Hōan, Memory Construction

Abstract

The significance of archives in historical research cannot be overstated. As primary sources, they offer invaluable insights into the past, shaping our collective memory and understanding of the world. Over time, many historical archives have been gradually opened and declassified, granting researchers access to historical truths that were previously inaccessible during the events themselves. However, while archives appear to be increasingly open and transparent, their accessibility remains a complex issue.With advancements in digital technology, archival materials can now be accessed remotely, seemingly providing unrestricted availability. Yet is the archive truly and fully open? Despite expanded access, archives do not necessarily offer a complete reconstruction of history, even for scholars. The historical record remains fragmented, and researchers must continually piece together evidence in pursuit of a more comprehensive understanding of the past.This article examines the openness of archives through an analysis of Rekidai Hōan (『歷代寶案』), focusing on the fundamental nature of archives, the impact of digital archiving, and a comparative study with oral historical sources.

References

Rekidai Hōan (Historical Records of Successive Generations),1690.

Mbembe, Achille. "The Power of the Archive and its Limits." In Refiguring the archive, pp. 19-27. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002.

Derrida, J. (1996). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/465144

Duranti, L. (2022). Why a world gone digital needs archival theory more than ever before? Archeion, 123, 1–21.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. Routledge.

Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.

Hodder, J., & Beckingham, D. (2022). Digital archives and recombinant historical geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 46(6), 1298–1310.

Lai, Z. (2016). Migration in the East China Sea and the spread of Han culture: Focusing on the thirty-six families of Ryukyu Min people. Social Sciences Academic Press. (赖正维《东海海域移民与汉文化的传播：以琉球闽人三十六姓为中心》，北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2016).

Manoff, M. (2004). Theories of the archive from across the disciplines. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2004.0015

Mbembe, A. (2002). The power of the archive and its limits. In C. Hamilton, V. Harris, J. Taylor, M. Pickover, G. Reid, & R. Saleh (Eds.), Refiguring the archive. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0570-8_2

Nahashi Kikaku-bu Shishihenshu-shitsu (the Naha City Planning Department, City History Editing Office). (1980). Nguyễn Clan Genealogy. In Kume Village Genealogies. Nahashi Kikaku-bu Shishihenshu-shitsu.（那覇市企画部市史編集室編『久米村系家譜』、那覇市企画部市史編集室、1980年。）

Oelofse, M., & Du Bruyn, D. (2005). A critical evaluation of memory as a potential source of evidence for oral history. Journal for Contemporary History, 30(2), 101–123.

Putnam, L. (2016). The transnational and the text-searchable: Digitized sources and the shadows they cast. The American Historical Review, 121(2), 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/121.2.377

Ries, T. (2022). Digital history and born-digital archives: The importance of forensic methods. Journal of the British Academy, 10, 157–185. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/010.157

Schwartz, J. M., & Cook, T. (2002). Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science, 2, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628