The Duke of Zhou from the perspective of psychological dynamics: the symbolic significance of the snake and the interweaving of Chinese culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14562550Keywords:
Snake; dream; subconscious; psychologyAbstract
This article explores the potential value of it in the field of psychology and its role in ancient Chinese culture. An important part of the cultural heritage of ancient China, it shows the systematic interpretation of dreams and reflects the ancient understanding of destiny and cosmic order. This work had a profound influence on folk culture and became a reference for decision making decisions in daily life. In contrast to the study of dreams in western psychology, the analysis of it reveals the universality of human exploration of the meaning of dreams and shows its potential value in the field of psychology. This cross-cultural psychological perspective can not only provide a deeper understanding of The book, but also provide an insight into the common psychological characteristics and subconscious patterns of human beings. Overall, this paper emphasizes the importance of Zhou Gong Jie Meng in the field of psychology and explores its deep connection in ancient Chinese culture.
Downloads
References
[1]Payne, Malcolm. CHAPTER 4 Psychodynamic relational practice. Modern social work theory Fifth edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2020.ISBN 978-1-352-01108-1.
[2]Dockeray, F. C. (1942). Psychology / Floyd Carlton Dockeray. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[3] Lin Biying. (2009). Mapping of cultural differences in animal metaphors. Teaching and Management (Middle-school Edition), 1,8687. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-5872-C.2009.01.040
[4] Luo Changpei. (2004). Language and Culture / Luo Changpei. Beijing Press.
[5] Lu Juan. (2010). The study of snake images in the Bible. Huazhong Normal University.
[6] Wang Yin. (2020). Recognition of linguistics: a localized study of cognitive linguistics / written by Wang Yin. (The 1st edition. ). The Commercial Press.
[7] Geng Zhanchun. (2020). Psychoanalytic Introduction. Literary Education (top), 1,17-.
[8], Ji Mingxia and Liu Hui. (2006). Fromms social character theory analysis. Journal of Qiqihar University (Philosophy and Social Sciences edition), 2,3840. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-2638.2006.02.013
[9] Tian Yu. (2017). A literary interpretation of the Bible. Electronic magazine of the New Education Era (Teacher edition), 9,253-.
[10] Feng Yuying. (2007). Comparison of the cultural connotation of animal nouns in English and Chinese culture —— Comparison of English and Chinese animal words. Journal of Suzhou College of Education, 10 (3), 8284. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8534.2007.03.052
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Qimin Yun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.