The Path of Codification: A Case Study on the Institutional Construction of Incorporating Wild Plant Protection Systems into the Code

Authors

  • Chang Xu School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Forestry University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71113/JCSIS.v2i6.311

Keywords:

Wild plant protection, Moderate codification, Natural resources law, Ecological environment code

Abstract

Against the backdrop of codification, it is necessary to consider the legislative status quo and theoretical value of the wild plant protection system. Aiming at the legislative shortcomings such as the incomplete legal system for wild plant protection, low hierarchical status, imperfect list system, and inability to connect with other departmental laws, a two-step strategy is proposed. The first step is to identify and fill gaps, summarize, and classify existing norms; the second step is to moderately codify by incorporating relatively important and programmatic provisions into the Ecological Environment Code. It is essential to systematically sort out legal systems, clarify legislative gaps, remedy legislative defects, learn from foreign experience, construct a systematic and ecological wild plant protection system, and enhance the codification level of China’s natural resource regulations.

References

Lü Zhongmei. Outline of Environmental Code Compilation [J]. China Legal Science, 2023(02):25-47.

Zhou Zhihua, Jin Xiaohua. Analysis and Suggestions on Policies and Legal Systems for Wild Plant Protection and Management in China [J]. Biodiversity Science, 2021,29(12):1583-1590.

Lü Zhongmei. From Implementation of Green Clauses to Compilation of Green Code (Preface) [J]. Environmental Resource Law Review, 2023,14(00):1-4.

Chen Wei. Ecological and Environmental Standards in Environmental Codes: Attributes, Problems, and Formats [J]. Legal Review, 2023,41(01):164-175.

Wu Weixing, Zhou Jiamin. Justification and Conception of the General Provisions of China's Environmental Code [J]. Southeast Law Review, 2023(01):84-98.

Huang Xisheng, Huang Shuting. Systematic Path of Natural Resource Legislation from the Perspective of Codification [J]. Hebei Law Science, 2023,41(05):2-19.

Luo Li. On Several Issues in the Codification of China's Environmental Law [J]. Tsinghua Law Review, 2023,17(04):92-105.

Fang Yin, Liu Xiuqing. Research on the Codification of China's Environmental Law: Progress, Debates, and Prospects [J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 2023,23(03):36-50.

Gong Gu. Exploration of the Cornerstone Concepts of Environmental Code: From the Evolution of Resources, Environment, and Ecology [J]. Chinese and Foreign Law, 2022,34(06):1523-1542.

Yang Zhaoxia. On the Nature of Environmental Rights [J]. China Legal Science, 2020(02):280-303.

Wang Canfa, Chen Shiyin. Justification and Conception of Codification of China's Environmental Law [J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2019,33(02):2-14.

Cao Wei. Theoretical Reflection and Scheme Construction of "Moderate Codification" of Environmental Law [J]. Legal System and Social Development, 2023,29(06):113-133.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-21

How to Cite

Xu, C. (2025). The Path of Codification: A Case Study on the Institutional Construction of Incorporating Wild Plant Protection Systems into the Code. Journal of Current Social Issues Studies, 2(6), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.71113/JCSIS.v2i6.311

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.