Income Inequality and Fertility Decline in China
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the influence of income inequality on the declining fertility rate in China from the perspective of educational expenditure. We employ provincial panel data from the China Statistical Yearbook spanning 2011 to 2020 for empirical analysis. The findings indicate: (1) Income inequality exerts a significant negative effect on the fertility rate. (2) The income distribution gap significantly diminishes education expenditures; however, after introducing the interaction term, the impact on the fertility rate becomes significantly positive, suggesting that increased income inequality enhances the positive influence of education expenditure on the fertility rate. (3) Considering the threshold effect of income disparity, when the income gap is relatively small, it positively influences the fertility rate, as evidenced by the positive interaction term. (4) This study selects after-school tutoring expenditure as an instrumental variable because it is correlated with income and its educational resources are exogenous, satisfying the conditions for two-stage least squares regression. Tutoring affects the income gap but does not directly influence the fertility rate, ensuring the validity of our results. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of the two-child policy implemented in 2016 and conclude that its impact has been limited. Therefore, we recommend that the Chinese government focus on reducing the financial burden of education on families to potentially improve the fertility rate.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Japaridze, I. (2019). Envy, inequality and fertility. Review of Economics of the Household, 17(3), 787–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-018-9427-z
Aassve, A., Arpino, B., & Balbo, N. (2016). It takes two to tango: Couples' happiness and childbearing. European Journal of Population, 32(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9385-1
Pestieau, P., & Ponthiere, G. (2015). Optimal life-cycle fertility in a Barro-Becker economy. Journal of Population Economics, 28(1), 45–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-014-0511-2
Parr, N. (2010). Satisfaction with life as an antecedent of fertility. Demographic Research, 22(21), 635–662. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.21
Li, M., Wang, Z., & Gao, Z. (2023). Infant rearing cost, “having children” and population birth rate. Population and Development.
Dai, H., Zheng, L., & Wang, J. (2023). Tired of the old? Effective boundary conditions and follow-along behavior of high-tech industrial policy: An empirical study based on the work reports of 205 prefecture-level cities. China Soft Science.
Fu, K., & Zou, W. (2023). Hope for prosperity, inequality of opportunity and fertility willingness. South China Economy.
Zhai, Z., & Li, S. (2023). The influencing factors of China’s low fertility rate in the new period. Journal of Jinan University (Social Science Edition).
Song, J., & Hu, B. (2022). The fertility motivation and fertility willingness of Chinese child-bearing age population. Population and Economy.
The intergenerational transmission of fertility intention: The influence of parents’ ideas and behaviors. (2022). Chinese Journal of Population Science.
Sun, X., Huang, Z., & Zhou, C. (2022). The impact of children’s education expenditure on the fertility willingness of couples of childbearing age. Population of Southern China.
Wang, C., & Luo, C. (2022). Adjustment of income distribution, improvement of social security and recovery of fertility rate: The experience and enlightenment of European Union in low fertility stage. Western Forum.
Shi, Z. (2022). From income to assets: Wealth inequality and residents’ fertility intention. Economic Review.
Zhou, Y., & Xie, Y. (2021). The macro-influencing factors of the ideal number of children of Chinese residents. Population Research.
Zhou, W. (2014). Brothers, household financial markets and savings rate in China. Journal of Development Economics, 111, 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.05.004
Wang, X., & Wen, Y. (2011). Housing prices and the high Chinese saving rate puzzle. China Economic Review, 22(4), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2011.09.003
Chamon, M. D., & Prasad, E. S. (2010). Why are saving rates of urban households in China rising? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1), 93–130. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.1.93
Horioka, C. Y., & Wan, J. (2007). The determinants of household saving in China: A dynamic panel analysis of provincial data. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(8), 2077–2096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00043.x
Giles, J., & Yoo, K. (2007). Precautionary behavior, migrant networks, and household consumption decisions: An empirical analysis using household panel data from rural China. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.3.534
Haider, S., & Solon, G. (2006). Life-cycle variation in the association between current and lifetime earnings. American Economic Review, 96(4), 1308–1320. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.4.1308
Fuchs-Schündeln, N., & Schündeln, M. (2005). Precautionary savings and self-selection: Evidence from the German reunification “experiment”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 1085–1120. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553053970197
Quadrini, V. (2000). The importance of entrepreneurship for wealth concentration and mobility. Review of Income and Wealth, 46(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2000.tb00309.x
Hurst, E., & Lusardi, A. (2004). Liquidity constraints, household wealth, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1086/381478
Meng, X. (2003). Unemployment, consumption smoothing, and precautionary saving in urban China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-5967(03)00048-3