Financing Decisions in a Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty and Government Consumer Subsidies

Main Article Content

Liangcan Mao
JiangXiang Ju

Abstract

Amid growing environmental pressures and resource constraints, green closed-loop supply chains (GCLSCs) play a vital role in achieving sustainable economic development. This study examines a GCLSC composed of one manufacturer and one retailer under uncertain market demand and government consumer subsidies. Using a Stackelberg game framework, we analyze the manufacturer’s production and financing decisions across three scenarios: no capital constraint, advance-payment financing, and equity financing. The results show that demand uncertainty, consumer price sensitivity, and green preference significantly affect optimal decisions. Under advance-payment financing, manufacturers raise wholesale prices but reduce product greenness and recycling levels, lowering their own profit while improving retailer gains. In contrast, equity financing aligns with the unconstrained benchmark, preserving environmental performance and overall efficiency. Numerical analyses confirm the theoretical findings. The study provides managerial insights for promoting green financing, enhancing consumer awareness, and fostering innovation in sustainable supply chains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Interdisciplinary Integration of Technology, Business, and Humanities in Modern Social Sciences

How to Cite

Mao, L., & Ju, J. (2025). Financing Decisions in a Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Demand Uncertainty and Government Consumer Subsidies. Journal of Modern Social Sciences, 3(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.71113/jmss.v3i1.463

References

Basiri, Z., & Heydari, J. (2017). A mathematical model for green supply chain coordination with substitutable products. Journal of cleaner production, 145, 232-249.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.060

Jian, J., Li, B., Zhang, N., & Su, J. (2021). Decision-making and coordination of green closed-loop supply chain with fairness concern. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126779.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126779

Oliveira, L. S., & Machado, R. L. (2021). Application of optimization methods in the closed-loop supply chain: a literature review. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 41(2), 357-400.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00677-y

Zhang, N., & Li, B. (2020). Pricing and coordination of green closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns. Ieee Access, 8, 224178-224189.https://doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045152.

Zhang, M. (2022).Government subsidy strategies in green closed-loop supply chains under alternative power structures https://doi.org/10.27263/d.cnki.gqudc.2022.000453.

Sinayi, M., & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2018). A game theoretic approach for pricing, greening, and social welfare policies in a supply chain with government intervention. Journal of cleaner production, 196, 1443-1458.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.212

Ma, W. M., Zhao, Z., & Ke, H. (2013). Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 221-227.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.033

Xing, G., & Li, Y. (2019).Production decision models for closed-loop supply chains considering government subsidies and product greenness. Logistics Technology, 42(9), 132–139.https://doi.org/10.13714/j.cnki.1002-3100.2019.09.030.

Meng, L., Huang, Z., Zhang, B., & Yang, Y. (2021).Modeling and analysis of consumer subsidy policies for remanufactured products in closed-loop supply chains. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 29(8), 148–160.https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0055.

Li, G., Wu, H., & Xiao, S. (2020). Financing strategies for a capital‐constrained manufacturer in a dual‐channel supply chain. International Transactions in Operational Research, 27(5), 2317-2339.https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12653

Zhen, X., Shi, D., Li, Y., & Zhang, C. (2020). Manufacturer’s financing strategy in a dual-channel supply chain: Third-party platform, bank, and retailer credit financing. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 133, 101820.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.101820

Wu, C., Xu, C., Zhao, Q., & Lin, S. (2022). Research on financing strategy of low-carbon supply chain based on cost-sharing contract. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(32), 48358-48375.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19291-y

Yu, M., Li, T., & Shi, Z. (2021). Financing strategy and carbon emission abatement in a supply chain considering retailers’ competition. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021(1), 1298195.https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1298195

Buzacott, J. A., & Zhang, R. Q. (2004). Inventory management with asset-based financing. Management Science, 50(9), 1274-1292.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0278

Guo, Z., & Xin, L. (2022).Green supply chain financing strategies under demand uncertainty: Implications for optimal production decisions and supplier financing choices. Price: Theory & Practice, (4), 181–184, 208.https://doi.org/10.19851/j.cnki.CN11-1010/F.2022.04.112.

Niu, P., & Hou, W. (2021).Supply chain financing strategies considering supplier delivery performance. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 29(10), 70–83.https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0572.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.